Advisory
Strategic decisions for leadership, with explicit trade-offs as the criterion: the decision stays yours, the method informs it.
Explicit trade-offsWhat to build and in what order, with limited resources
Explicit business and architecture trade-offs to decide between competing product options: the decision stays yours, the method informs it.
Duration: depends on the scope of the options at play · Includes: option mapping + trade-off evaluation
Scope and timeline are adjusted per case, not published as a closed package.
1
Options and constraints mapping
What’s being considered, what resources are really available.
2
Trade-off evaluation
Business impact and technical cost, together, with explicit reasoning.
3
Roadmap and follow-up
Verifiable milestones + review points set in advance.
Validated before buildingHow your product sustains itself, before you invest in building it
Diagnosis of the current business model (or its absence), identification of the critical assumptions behind it, and a sustainability financial plan before committing major resources.
Duration: depends on the model's complexity · Includes: revenue/cost mapping + critical assumption identification
Scope and timeline are adjusted per case, not published as a closed package.
1
Diagnosing the current model
What model exists today, even if implicit, and the assumptions holding it up.
2
Design and validation
Prioritizing which assumptions to validate first, with cheap, concrete tests, not a full launch.
3
Sustainability financial plan
A realistic projection with scenarios, and whether external financing makes sense, and of what kind.
Security firstSecurity, quality, and scalability for what your team already built with AI
More and more teams are building real solutions (e-commerce, internal tools) with AI, with no prior technical experience. It works, until it needs to scale, stay secure, or be maintained: that's where the risks nobody without experience can see in time start to show up. I assess how solid what was built actually is, and what it needs to hold up in real production.
Duration: depends on the scope of the solution being assessed · Includes: technical review + security assessment + scaling plan
Scope and timeline are adjusted per case, not published as a closed package.
1
Technical review of what was built
How solid the architecture actually is, and where the real security and quality risks are.
2
Risk-based prioritization
What needs fixing before scaling, and what can wait.
3
Scaling plan
How to sustain the solution in real production, with or without an in-house technical team.